National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
Within the bill NIFA would receive $1.642 billion, a decrease of $34.3 million below the FY 2026 enacted level. Per the report accompanying the bill, funding for capacity programs is flat, a stark contrast to the proposed cuts and eliminations proposed by the Trump Administration. The Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) would receive $435 million, flat with FY 2026. The Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program would be reduced by $8 million, and the Sun Grant and Farm Business Programs would be increased $500,000 each. The House bill once again allows the matching requirement for the Specialty Crop Research Initiative to be waived by the Secretary of Agriculture.
The Committee provides no funding for the following NIFA programs:
- Rural Health and Safety Initiative
- Continuing Animal H&D Program
- Secondary and 2-year Post-Secondary Education
- Research Equipment Grants
- Global Change UV Monitoring
- Open Data Standards for Neutral Data Repository
- Methyl Bromide Transition Program
Report language encouraging NIFA to support the Artificial Intelligence Research Institutes and “renew the five current institutes at current funding levels for the next five years, and to begin planning a process for these institutes to become permanent” is included. The report also “encourages NIFA to prioritize competitive research proposals from land-grant institutions that develop and deploy agricultural AI applications for specialty crop production, including technologies to mechanize harvesting, expand precision agriculture tools, and address critical invasive species and plant disease threats,” and consider the designation of Centers of Excellence at land-grant institutions that demonstrate leadership in AI research and innovation.
The Committee reaffirms support for the Research Facilities Act with this included report language, “The Committee recognizes the need for facility improvements at our nation’s land-grant universities and notes that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119–21) provided $125,000,000 per year in perpetuity for the Research Facilities Act.”
The report also urges USDA to consider awarding no less than 15% of funding available under the Grants and Fellowships for Food and Agricultural Sciences Education program to two-year institutions for grants related to agricultural conservation education and workforce development. Additional directions are given for Agricultural Research Enhancement Awards, citrus disease research, the Farm and Stress Assistance Network program, 1862/1890 partnerships, and numerous other programs.
Additional details will be provided after the markup. To watch the markup or review the bill and report, please click here.
House Advances Farm Bill
The House Farm Bill, H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, was passed today (April 30) on a vote of 224-200, with three Republicans voting against the bill while 14 Democrats voted in favor. This ends a week filled with highly contentious debate, delays, and at one point, suggestions the bill be pulled entirely. Spurring passage was the stripping of year-round E15 (it will be considered on its own at a later date) and bipartisan passage (280-142) of an amendment that strips language on pesticide labeling uniformity.
Following passage of the bill, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-AR) released a statement applauding the passage and stated, “I remain committed to working with my colleagues in the Senate to continue this momentum and deliver Farm Bill 2.0 to the president’s desk to be signed into law. I look forward to releasing legislative text in the coming weeks.”
The Financial Accountability in Research (FAIR) Model (Webinar Recording)
On Wednesday, April 8, APLU hosted a briefing for BAA leadership with APLU's Debbie Altenburg, VP, Research Policy, and Advocacy and Dr. Kelvin Drogemier, Chair of the Subject Matter Expert committee for the Joint Association Group (JAG) on Indirect Costs (and current Special Advisor to the Chancellor for Science and Policy, University of Illinois- Urbana-Champaign), to discuss the state of play regarding federal grant indirect rate policy negotiations, the FAIR model, and how these intersect with USDA-funded research.
A recording of the webinar can be viewed here.
Passcode: FD1szF=8
Last year, APLU and several other national organizations came together to form the Joint Associations Group (JAG) on Indirect Costs and developed an efficient and transparent alternative model for how the federal government reimburses universities for the costs associated with conducting research on behalf of the American people, the Financial Accountability in Research (FAIR) model. Long term, APLU and the JAG associations will be advocating for the FAIR model to be adopted by federal agencies to support the true costs of conducting research. It is important for the BAA to consider if the agricultural research community might join these efforts.
Additional resources on the current status of USDA indirect rates and the FAIR model are available here:
- NIFA explainer on indirect rates
- USDA indirect rates explainer from the University of Wisconsin
- APLU website on F&A and JAG
- White paper on the FAIR model link and PDF
